(White Paper) Incomplete IP Identified Devices and what to do with them

[Chris McDevitt]

I have put down my thoughts on how to handle Incomplete IP Identified Devices.

I would like to hear your ideas on this topic. How is your organization handling them?

(See Attachment)

[Chris McDevitt]

You are welcome. It takes a village to raise a CMDB. Organizations must focus on completeness and correctness. For a CMDB there is no such thing as done. The goal should be continuous improvement

[Maloy Banerjee1]

Thank you so much for the article. Is there also an article for handling the Unclassed Hardware?

[Chris McDevitt]

Hi,

Try this:

https://www.servicenow.com/community/secops-articles/vulnerability-response-and-the-discovered-items...

Let me know if you have more questions.

[Micky Rathod]

This information is brilliant! Thank you, @Chris McDevitt  for putting together such well thought out pdf.
SN Account Teams needs to have easy access to such information to make their and customers lives easier!

[PaulSylo]

Hi Chris - i followed the whitepaper, but my findings are quite different. I see my Rapid 7 scanner is configured with a reversion IP address lookup, and DNS server are pointing to PTR records. but still a large amount of CI grouped under this "incomplete IP address class" and unclassified hardware class. I am sure something I missing here , I need your thoughts, may be other possibilities,.