- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-22-2020 12:04 PM
Problem description:
Proposed Solution:
Task validation fails with error message:
Please advise.
Regards,
PHS
Solved! Go to Solution.
- 18,072 Views
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-23-2020 11:25 AM
I created a ticket with Service Now Learning Team and they proposed updating the priorities to 100 and 200 respectively:
That completed the task validation successfully.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-03-2021 09:05 AM
Check above threads and answers - I think this requirement is not correct and few users raised it with Service Now team and they suggested to change the Order as 100/200 so after reading every answers and all discussions i reached on this conclusion and task got completed.
Regards,
Nikhil Bajaj
ServiceNow Rising Star-2025
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-03-2021 09:25 AM
We have a good video on Now Learning showing the enhancement of reconciliation rules in Paris where Precedence and Reconciliation rules were merged.
https://nowlearning.service-now.com/lxp?id=overview&sys_id=679a21be1be550d0fde3a687bd4bcbe2&type=course
The rule is very simple, you have defined a reconciliation rule with two sources, meaning both are allowed to update records in the Windows class. The priority determines which is the authoritative truth, so if ServiceNow updates a record and the discovery source of the CI now displays ServiceNow, no other authorized discovery source with a higher priority order number is allowed to update the record. It is confusing as the lower order number has higher priority, but this is common with other lists in ServiceNow, so it is consistent across the platform (i.e. business rules). Any source with order 100 has higher priority than a source with order 200.
Hope this helps.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-14-2021 08:50 AM
I agree. There should be some filtering but it works
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-14-2021 09:40 AM
The filtering so to speak takes place by defining the data source on the first tab of the wizard. You are choosing a data source to build the reconciliation rule with so there is no need to define a filter for the data source as well. The filter is used to maybe filter on a specific operating system or device of a specific manufacturer that the rule can be used for.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-18-2021 01:16 PM
Thank you
