- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-27-2022 07:30 AM
Today I created a Business Rule to populate a field based on changes in another field. I just disabled it to test something but the field is still being updated. Could this be a cache issue? Does something like this happen from time to time? Or must there be some other reason for such behavior? I ran cache.do to clear the ServiceNow cache, but the field is still being updated. It's very confusing.
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-27-2022 07:46 AM
No business rule will not run if it's made active false. Check if there is a business rule on parent table that is running or any flow designers.Use system debug -> script tracer to understand which script is running.
Mark correct and helpful.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-27-2022 07:46 AM
No business rule will not run if it's made active false. Check if there is a business rule on parent table that is running or any flow designers.Use system debug -> script tracer to understand which script is running.
Mark correct and helpful.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-27-2022 07:51 AM
Hi,
are you sure there is no other BR?
Did you debug the business rules from left navigation?
Regards
Ankur
Ankur
✨ Certified Technical Architect || ✨ 9x ServiceNow MVP || ✨ ServiceNow Community Leader
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-27-2022 07:51 AM
Hi
No, If you made a BR inactive, then it won't run. There must be another script that is updating the field.
One way that you can find it is - in sys_script table, run a query - script CONTAINS field_name. Then you will get a list of scripts which is involved to update the field. It'd be easy to find then.
Regards,
Snehangshu Sarkar