- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-01-2017 03:24 AM
Hi All,
I have the following label and checkboxes on a record producer:
These appear based on the answer of another variable. I need the label to be mandatory when these variables appear, but if any of the checkboxes are ticked for it to no longer be mandatory. This needs to work so if any or all or anything inbetween are ticked.
I've been trying to achieve this through UI Policy but have been struggling, is this possible using this or do I need to write a catalog client script?
Any help on this is greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Sam
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-01-2017 05:15 AM
Hi,
the idea is correct the place to use wrong, use it on a catalog ui policy as already mentioned.
better approach using conditions to work if the current value is not default value. Eg. false is default for cert field, i would use condition as cert is not false.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-02-2017 08:15 AM
use it in the same ui policy
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-03-2017 02:34 AM
Hi Sam,
You do not need to create another UI policy for this.
You can make doc affected 'Mandatory' in your 1st UI policy.
Raj
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-03-2017 03:25 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-01-2017 05:15 AM
Hi,
the idea is correct the place to use wrong, use it on a catalog ui policy as already mentioned.
better approach using conditions to work if the current value is not default value. Eg. false is default for cert field, i would use condition as cert is not false.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-03-2017 03:26 AM
Thanks for this, got me to think correctly.
I was being fairly stupid around the logic before.
Thanks