Best practices for ticket in 'planning' priority?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎02-09-2016 01:15 PM
Hi SNOW Community,
What does everyone feel is the best practices for having a 'planning' priority where a ticket doesn't have an SLA attached to it, we're waiting on a vender or where the record is for something occurring far in the future?
Since we can't edit the state field in Express, we're using the priority level 4-Planning to pause the clock. However, from the techs perspective, this seems to cause some confusion since the SLA Due still states a date and time for when the SLA is due.
Thoughts?
Thanks!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎02-09-2016 01:30 PM
Hello Amber:
ITIL uses three metrics: Impact, Urgency, & Priority ITIL also suggests, that Priority be made dependent on Impact & Urgency. In the base system in ServiceNow, Priority is generated from urgency and impact according to data look up rules. By default Priority is read-only. If you are an Admin, you can change how Priority is calculated according to your organization's requirements. for more detailed information refer to the following link: Incident Management - ServiceNow Wiki .
Hope this is helpful.
P.S. Mark it Correct and Helpful
Kind regards
Danny