- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-02-2015 04:24 AM
There is a module 'CI/User relationship types' under Configuration application. We can also create relationships of ci with a user/group.
But the question is,
Where these CI/User relationships are stored ?
I'm sure that they are not in 'cmdb_rel_ci' table . If we know that table we can use ci/user relations to assign a support owner,BS Admin (lots of references to user table) to a ci and reduce many of the fields in child cmdb_ci tables .
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-05-2015 05:05 AM
These relationships are stored in cmdb_rel_person table. They are useful when you want to link several users that perform one function for a certain CI (e.g. several sysadmins for one server).
If you are sure there will be only one user supporting a CI, then a dedicated field on a Configuration Item table would work better IMHO.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-05-2015 04:06 AM
Hi,
For All CI If you have created a "Support Owner Group" field as Reference you not need to create a relation ship.
In my case I have created a Reference field on CI and attached a Group to that CI.
because Support group may have more than 1 member for support so I recommend you to create Support group and keep Reference of that group in CI. Instead of creating Relationship B/W CI and User.
Thanks,
Sanjeev Kumar
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-05-2015 05:05 AM
These relationships are stored in cmdb_rel_person table. They are useful when you want to link several users that perform one function for a certain CI (e.g. several sysadmins for one server).
If you are sure there will be only one user supporting a CI, then a dedicated field on a Configuration Item table would work better IMHO.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-05-2015 09:42 PM
Thanks Bondarchik , thats what i was looking for 'cmdb_rel_person'
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-20-2020 08:54 AM
I was trying to use the Assigned Ti field to store that value.
Should I be using something different or is there a way to use the Assigned to field?