Get parameters from the URL in the Service Catalog record producer
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎06-09-2016 04:06 PM
Hello everybody. This is my first post here so apologies if I am doing anything stupid.
So, I am trying to create a service catalog record producer to take some inputs from the user (obviously) but I also need to get a parameter from the URL. I have been trying (unsuccessfully) to do this in the 'What it will contain' script section.
All the links I have found suggest this: Parse URL Parameters in a Client Script - ServiceNow Guru
When doing this however, the logs say about document not been defined in javascript. Is there any other way of getting a specific param from the URL?
The error message is here:
org.mozilla.javascript.EcmaError: "document" is not defined.
Caused by error in Record Producer: 'Add dish to Order' at line 11
8: }
9:
10: function getParmVal(name){
==> 11: var url = document.URL.parseQuery();
12: if(url[name]){
13: return decodeURI(url[name]);
14: }
Thanks for any help, it would be very much appreciated.

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎06-09-2016 04:27 PM

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎06-09-2016 04:31 PM
Hi Chris,
I've been seeing this pop up in more and more client scripts. Haven't tried it in a catalog client script, but it's worth a try.
var gURL = new GlideURL(); | |
gURL.setFromCurrent(); | |
var user = gURL.getParam("sysparm_user"); |
(don't ask why this HTML editor decided a table was the right thing for a straight text copy/paste)
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎06-09-2016 04:48 PM
Doing this got me the error Glide URL is not allowed in scoped applications
after working on this for many hours, I decided to take another approach and I managed to get the information via another method which is probably more secure then taking the data from the url.
Thanks for your help though - I will come back to this (when I dont have a deadline for a couple of hours!) and play around with this!

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎06-09-2016 04:53 PM
Thanks Chris. Care to share what your solution was?