- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-13-2024 04:44 AM
Hi.
Sorry - a beginners question.
In order to introduce a Business Rule to prevent closure of a RITM if there are outstanding Approval Requests, we need our ITIL agents (role = itil) to be able to set the State of an Approval Request to "No Longer Required".
Any guidance as to the best way of making the field Read/Write for ITIL agents ?
With my admin role, I am able to select "No Longer Required" for State -
But, when impersonating an agent, the field is read only -
Any help gratefully received.
Thanks in advance.
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Labels:
-
Request Management
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-13-2024 05:04 AM
Your question should be: why are ITIL users allowed to work on a RITM that has not yet been approved? The entire logic behind approvals is that something is requested and before it's done, it needs to be approved by someone else.
Why do you even have approvals if you are letting your agents just ignore them?
If there is a valid reason (like no delegation and someone has left the company without approving), you could apply some logic that an ITIL user can trigger a flow with some kind of reasoning so no audits will ever cost you any certifications (like ISO). But this requirement is not one to just develop. Challenge it and if they still want it, fight it. It is the worst possible practice imaginable.
Please mark any helpful or correct solutions as such. That helps others find their solutions.
Mark
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-13-2024 05:04 AM
Your question should be: why are ITIL users allowed to work on a RITM that has not yet been approved? The entire logic behind approvals is that something is requested and before it's done, it needs to be approved by someone else.
Why do you even have approvals if you are letting your agents just ignore them?
If there is a valid reason (like no delegation and someone has left the company without approving), you could apply some logic that an ITIL user can trigger a flow with some kind of reasoning so no audits will ever cost you any certifications (like ISO). But this requirement is not one to just develop. Challenge it and if they still want it, fight it. It is the worst possible practice imaginable.
Please mark any helpful or correct solutions as such. That helps others find their solutions.
Mark
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-13-2024 06:03 AM
Thanks, Mark. That makes sense and is, obviously, the better way forward.
We're brand new to ServiceNow and have ended up with a whole heap of unnecessary approval requests that are littering the place up. We'll find a more suitable method of tidying up and preventing more from happening.