In change management should you be able to rollback a rejected approval?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-12-2014 05:54 AM
If an approval is rejected within change management should you then be able to roll it back so that it resets tasks/approvals?
Is this best practice & considered alignment to the ITIL framework?
I know that yes it can be implemented, as with everything in ServiceNow you can basically build what you want, but would this such process be considered best practice?

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-12-2014 06:21 AM
we have this rollback in many of our processes...
Let's take a change request for example ... The change request reaches for CAB approval and they feel that the information provided is not per the compliance policy , they may reject the request and ask the concerned people to rework it following the compliance policy set.. so in this case , rather than closing the request as is,the same can be used for rework... Thus facilitates in avoiding creation of duplicate change requests for the same task.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-12-2014 06:25 AM
and if you need some implementation help , you need not create from scratch as there are predefined activities for the same
this should help in your implementation if needed
http://wiki.servicenow.com/index.php?title=Selecting_a_Rollback_Activity
Designing Workflows with Rollback To - ServiceNow Wiki
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-12-2014 06:28 AM
Yes thanks for that i have used the rollback activites before, just wanted to check if it is best practice to rollback approvals on a change request?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-12-2014 06:25 AM
Ok... but is this something that auditors approve of? Is this best practice for Change Management?
Would it be better to have a triage task prior to going to CAB?
In a previous role i have worked with very strict CAB approvers, if the change is missing information when it goes to CAB it is rejected with comments and must be re-raised.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-12-2014 06:29 AM
Well it's heavily audited here and not been brought up as an audit issue, like I say as long as it's fully audited, we have retraction reason/comments etc that are mandatory if the approver changes their mind etc.
We can sometimes have 25 approval groups, now imagine how much of a headache it is and waste of time to rollback and gather approval from everyone again.... that's the main driver for it.