Guidance on good practice cleaning data from sys_update_version
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-10-2022 12:18 AM
Is there any recommendation on retaining record in sys_update_version. Its one of our biggest tables obviously and wondering if you’ve come across anyone having done anything with clean-ups on it. Obviously you lose the ‘restore to version’ if you remove but wondering how far back this really needs to go
- Labels:
-
Healthscan
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-10-2022 12:31 AM
Hi
You can refer to these threads :
Mark my answer correct & Helpful, if Applicable.
Thanks,
Sandeep
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-10-2022 12:44 AM
This is more about the practice of retention of records specifically in sys_update_version and not how to cleanup
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-27-2024 05:32 AM
I am having the same challenge, obviously we want to keep these records for a while...but for how long ?
Also, I do not think data retention policies in the Organization would help here, as this is more about what was configured/developer rathe than data.
I would personally look at number of records plus their storage consumption. Then depending on your budget (for storage) make a decision.

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-30-2025 06:32 PM
The sys_update_version table was also the biggest table on our instance by a mile. Turns out the em_connector_instance table was responsible for 93% of its size. These are for event management connectors like SCOM and Solarwinds. Resolution is to raise a case with Now Support.
https://support.servicenow.com/kb?id=kb_article_view&sysparm_article=KB0998845