- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎06-13-2025 10:43 AM
Hi,
I have created new ACL for 'sc_task' table 'state' field with the new role - 'internal'
I have provided 'internal' role to 'X' user, but this 'X' user is unable to edit the 'state' field.
I have checked there is no ACL's for 'state' field. but user is able read the fields by provided 'sn_req_read' role.
Can you please suggest i am missed anywhere - any query-range ACL is restricted?
tried with added script - answer = gs.hasRole('internal');
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎06-16-2025 07:28 AM
Hi,
a moment ago
Create a table level ACL with the same role then create Field level ACL with state field.
Without table level ACL field level won't work.
Restrict any extra fields editable.

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎06-13-2025 11:48 AM
You can use the Access Analyzer to see what ACLs that the user is passing/failing.
Here is a link to the SN docs.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎06-16-2025 07:28 AM
Hi,
a moment ago
Create a table level ACL with the same role then create Field level ACL with state field.
Without table level ACL field level won't work.
Restrict any extra fields editable.