Audit Issues - Install status vs hardware status
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-03-2026 01:56 AM
I'm having an issue explaining in layman terms why service now chose to apply hardware status of stolen out of the box for missing/absent assets in asset/cmdb.
I have supplied the breakdown of how asset state and substate relate to hardware status but I cant fully explain why we use Absent/stolen for missing assets that aren't actually stolen.
As mentioned, this came direct from integration out of the box so hopefully you can help define why.
Thanks
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
4 weeks ago
Hi @GChat
Refer these links, if it helps:
Can anyone help me to know the lost /stolen process
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/dealing-loststolen-assets-laurence-tindall/
For knowledge ,You can go through it
Mastering Hardware Asset Management in ServiceNow-Chapter 2
Map asset state and CI hardware status
https://hi.service-now.com/kb_view.do?sysparm_article=KB0717902
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
4 weeks ago
sorry thats not the issue - these are not stolen
