- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-31-2022 01:06 AM
How to stop discovery from updating the retired CI's. The operation team created a new machine with the same name. Now discovery is updating the retired CI not the new one.
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Labels:
-
Discovery
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-31-2022 10:41 AM
Simple as adding an Identification Inclusion rule where state is not retired on the hardware identifier. We will skip the retired CI and create a new record.

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-03-2022 12:12 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-04-2022 01:17 PM
Make sure it was in the same class, the manually created one. That you dont have any precedence rules and maybe change the discovery source?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-23-2022 08:58 AM
This does not seem to work when using the API to create/update CIs. The inclusion rule is ignored and the CI is updated. Any idea why?
For details see:
createOrUpdateCIEnhanced ignoring Identification Inclusion rule
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
11-23-2022 09:42 AM
Create precedence rule. Define the discovery source. That will help
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-02-2022 06:57 AM
Has this changed, @doug_schulze ? An inclusion rule to ignore retired CIs is not working for me in San Diego when handing data to the IRE via API. See my post here for details: createOrUpdateCIEnhanced ignoring Identification Inclusion rule
I have tried != Retired, I have tried everything but Retired, I even tried requiring a Status that no CI has, and the IRE ignores them all and continues to run the match in all cases. I haven't found a switch for the API call that turns inclusion rules on/off, but maybe they aren't coded or are off by default?
Any information on this would be appreciated.