SecOps forum
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Forum Posts

Resolved! How often "reapply rule" on risk calculator runs?

Is there any scheduled job configured to kick off this reapply rule on risk calculator just like on group rules? I know a job runs for every 4 hrs or every day to trigger "reapply rule" on group rules. Does anyone know about risk calculator?

Nowlearner by Kilo Guru
  • 972 Views
  • 1 replies
  • 2 helpfuls

How to restrict personalize_dictionary role?

Hello Community! I want to restrict the personalize_dictionary role to only create or rename tables&fields under cmdb_ci table, nowhere else.Basically what I need is to prevent "admin" access other tables but cmdb_ci and its descendants. Is there a w...

Szilard by Tera Guru
  • 1729 Views
  • 1 replies
  • 2 helpfuls

Resolved! Which tables are not included in the update set?

I have moved the Vulnerability Response update set from the development environment to the verification environment. I understand that Scheduled Jobs are not included in the update set, so I need to export and transport them as an XML file in my deve...

nagaryu by Tera Contributor
  • 1491 Views
  • 6 replies
  • 5 helpfuls

Resolved! Problema with MIME types attachments: filename.xlsx.p7m

Hello all. We should attach to KB articles attachment of xlsx files digitally signed (p7m), just like "example_file.xlsx.p7m". Both extension are permitted in system property "glide.attachment.extensions" and we want to mantain "glide.security.file.m...

How is the Qualys rescan function setup?

VR 14.0.6 with Qualys 12.1.1 Issue: Initiating a rescan within a VIT produces a status message of "Error code 1901. Message: Unrecognized parameters." V12.1.1 claimed to fix this error code, but it is still occurring. Any ideas?

Resolved! Fixing Detection Keys for Qualys Job settings

I have been working on an early upgrade instance where we get to Rome AND latest updates for Vulnerability Response and the Qualys Integration for Security Operations applications.  Within those updates we are going from v13 VR to v15 which include t...

Joe Kline by Kilo Guru
  • 1159 Views
  • 2 replies
  • 2 helpfuls

Resolved! auto-close feature in vulnerable Item table

Hi All,  is auto close feature in  the Vulnerable items will close the VITs which are in deferral State ?.if so on what basic they are closing. Also how to identify which VITs are closed on a particular date and reopened? please suggest and help me. ...

rudra1 by Tera Expert
  • 1139 Views
  • 2 replies
  • 1 helpfuls

Discovered Items - Best Practices for handling new devices

Hello everyone, Just wanted to see how everyone handles devices that get added into the CMDB as an Unclassed Hardware.   Looking to see how others are addressing the following situations: Undesired devices in the CMDB are classified as Unclassed Hard...

JGNYSTRS by Giga Contributor
  • 2179 Views
  • 2 replies
  • 1 helpfuls

Resolved! Qualys Integration runs are stuck in "Wait complete" state

Gentlemen, We are using Qualys Integration Module with our Now instance. Since the past cpl of weeks, all the Qualys integration runs are in a state "Wait complete" , even though the substate shows to be "success".   Any idea how to troubleshoot this...

find_real_file.png
Scorpion81 by Mega Expert
  • 2902 Views
  • 3 replies
  • 5 helpfuls

Resolved! What's the purpose of Auto-Close Stale Vulnerable Items ?

Could someone explain the purpose of the Auto-Close Stale Vulnerable Items feature? I thought this was a big win for me on 2 different issues: 1.) CI's that are Decommissioned and thus no longer able to be validated by Qualys as remediated.   2.) Vul...

Scott58 by Kilo Contributor
  • 2804 Views
  • 8 replies
  • 2 helpfuls

Resolved! Can CI lookup rules "find" Unclassed Hardware?

Good morning, I'm trying to understand if CI lookup rules can return an "Unclassed Hardware" item?   Here is the situation: - I have a vulnerability on "somehost.domain.com" - There is a matching CI in the CMDB, but is was just called "somehost" and ...

Christoph4 by Tera Contributor
  • 2154 Views
  • 4 replies
  • 0 helpfuls

Resolved! Reapply CI lookup rules UI action shows 0 records processed

Hello friends, While running UI action named - "Reapply CI Lookup Rules" on Unmatched Discovered Items, its not showing number of records processed. It shows as all counts as 0 such as Processed, 0Updated, etc. Does anyone have idea ? Thanks,Rahul