We've updated the ServiceNow Community Code of Conduct, adding guidelines around AI usage, professionalism, and content violations. Read more

Change request ACL on "Impact" field

Poorvi Kulkarni
Tera Contributor

Hello,

 

My requirement is to make all the fields on change request form editable for ITIL users in "New" State and read-only in all other states.

Currently, I have a write star ACL and field level write ACL for "Impact" field with ITIL role for new state. But, the field is read-only on all the states. Please do share your insights on the same.

 

Thanks in advance!!

3 REPLIES 3

Runjay Patel
Giga Sage

Hi @Poorvi Kulkarni ,

 

There is already OOB field level write acl written for Impact which allow to write it if user have role sn_change_write. make sure your itil user have this role. Do share your code which you are writing to prevent this.

Simple ACL you need to write with condition state =new.

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

If you found my response helpful, please consider selecting "Accept as Solution" and marking it as "Helpful." This not only supports me but also benefits the community.


Regards
Runjay Patel - ServiceNow Solution Architect
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@RunjayP
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/runjay

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Part 1. This video serves as the introductory episode of the ServiceNow Fundamental Course playlist. Here, I've outlined the course content that I'll be delving into throughout this series. For document please visit: https://servicenowwithrunjay.com/ Follow Facebook page for latest update on ...

Sandeep Rajput
Tera Patron

@Poorvi Kulkarni I recommend using Access Analyser to check which ACL is not allowing the user to edit the fields in the New state. For more information you can refer to https://www.servicenow.com/docs/bundle/xanadu-platform-security/page/integrate/identity/concept/acce...

Poorvi Kulkarni
Tera Contributor

@Sandeep Rajput , used the access analyser, found this. I do not understand why this is blocked.

PoorviKulkarni_0-1736180057747.png

PoorviKulkarni_1-1736180128479.png