- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎08-12-2020 11:19 PM
Hi team,
Consider a scenario where someone has raised a policy exception with all valid values and it has been sent for approval and its waiting for the approval and in between the valid to field expires. Then if someone approves a policy exception will the policy exception will move forward or not.
I tried but its keep on giving the valid to should be in future kind of error and we can't proceed further. Here the user has raised the exception and its approved but due to valid to field getting expired before exception getting approved its stuck.... and state is not getting changed to approved so that workflow could trigger. Is it a feature or a bug!!
Regards
Dhruv
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Labels:
-
Policy and Compliance Management
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎08-14-2020 04:02 PM
It seems a question of very short timeframes on a PER. If that is the case, I think you need to look more at how you can support the behaviours not bypass the process. Are the approvers having trouble? Are the requesters requesting things too late, or with too little notice?
In change management, the concept of 'retrospective change' exists. In PER , is an approval received for something in the past not a similar thing? A record of something.
PER was built to help organisations provide temporary relief for any control(s). This means in material terms that those controls will be marked compliant/exempt and attestation will be bypassed. Once closed, the control will revert back and if the issue is still open, will be non-compliant again. If it was an attestation issue and you re-attest (automatically) and the issue is still open, the successful attestation will set the control back to compliant and close the issue.
Trying to alter this approval and overall behaviour is dangerous. PER has just had a really good lick of paint in v10.1 and making changes to any core flows will certainly increase complexity and risk in future upgrades.
Happy to discuss more, hope this helps and thanks for reaching out!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎08-13-2020 01:40 AM
Hi
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎08-14-2020 03:04 AM
Hi Dhruv,
This was the issue which we also had. We did some modification and bypassed the check if it is waiting for approval state.
Check UI Script which handles this.
Thanks,
Ashutosh
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎08-14-2020 04:02 PM
It seems a question of very short timeframes on a PER. If that is the case, I think you need to look more at how you can support the behaviours not bypass the process. Are the approvers having trouble? Are the requesters requesting things too late, or with too little notice?
In change management, the concept of 'retrospective change' exists. In PER , is an approval received for something in the past not a similar thing? A record of something.
PER was built to help organisations provide temporary relief for any control(s). This means in material terms that those controls will be marked compliant/exempt and attestation will be bypassed. Once closed, the control will revert back and if the issue is still open, will be non-compliant again. If it was an attestation issue and you re-attest (automatically) and the issue is still open, the successful attestation will set the control back to compliant and close the issue.
Trying to alter this approval and overall behaviour is dangerous. PER has just had a really good lick of paint in v10.1 and making changes to any core flows will certainly increase complexity and risk in future upgrades.
Happy to discuss more, hope this helps and thanks for reaching out!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎08-21-2020 10:58 AM
