Matching criteria for case assignment
Summarize
Summary of Matching Criteria for Case Assignment
The assignment workbench in ServiceNow utilizes configurable matching criteria to evaluate agents based on their skills, availability, and workload, providing a ranked list of potential case assignees. This ensures that cases are assigned to the most suitable agents, enhancing efficiency and service quality.
Show less
Key Features
- Types of Matching Criteria:
- Simple Match: One-to-one matching based on specific attributes (e.g., agent time zone).
- Aggregate: Returns a set of users based on a filter applied to a selected table.
- Scripted: Custom queries return a list of users based on specific scripts.
- Criteria for Ranking Agents:
- Availability Today: Based on agents' work schedules and personal time off.
- Matching Skills: Number of skills matching those required for the case.
- Mandatory Skills Support: Filters agents based on mandatory skills for the case.
- Assigned Cases: Total cases currently assigned to an agent.
- Last Assigned: Prioritizes agents based on their most recent case assignments.
- Configuration Options: Customize ranking and display settings for each criterion, including ranking method, weight, and threshold.
Key Outcomes
By configuring matching criteria effectively, ServiceNow customers can ensure optimal case assignment, leading to improved agent workload distribution and enhanced service delivery. Agents are ranked based on calculated values from their matching criteria, allowing for data-driven decisions in case management.
The assignment workbench uses configurable matching criteria, such as skills and availability, to evaluate the agents in a selected group and provide an overall ranking.
- Simple Match: creates one-to-one matching, such as matching the time zone of an agent with the time zone of a task location.
- Aggregate: uses a simple query and returns an aggregate result. For an aggregate type, select a table and create a filter, and then select an aggregate field such as the Assigned to field. This type of query returns a set of users.
- Scripted: uses a scripted query which returns a list of users.
- Availability Today: Availability is calculated based on the agent's work schedule, assigned work, and personal time off. The more availability an agent has, the higher the contribution to the agent's overall rank.
- Matching Skills: The number of agent skills that match the skills required for the case. The more skills that match, the higher the contribution to the agent's overall rank.
- Matching Skills - Mandatory Skills Support Calculates the number
of agent skills that match the mandatory skills. It does this by filtering out all agents
who do not have the mandatory skills and ranks the remaining agents. The more skills that
match, the higher the contribution to the agent's overall rank. Note:If using the mandatory skills feature, use the Matching Skills - Mandatory Skills Support criterion to match agents with the mandatory skills identified for a case.
- Assigned Cases: The number of cases already assigned to this agent. The more cases assigned, the lower the contribution to the agent's overall rank.
- Last Assigned: For the sake of balancing assigned work, prioritized the agent based on the last assigned work.
To create matching criteria, select the type and use the fields related to that type to build the query. After creating matching criteria, you can create a configuration for the assignment workbench by creating a matching rule of the type Selection criteria and selecting the desired matching criteria.
- ranking and display usage
- ranking method
- ranking weight
- threshold
- active/inactive
Ranking and display usage
- Ranking and display: uses the criterion to determine agent ranking and displays it in a column on the workbench.
- Display only: displays the criterion in a column on the workbench but does not use it to determine agent ranking.
- Ranking only: uses the criterion to determine agent ranking but does not display it on the workbench.
Ranking method
- More is better: for example, more availability is better when determining the agent ranking.
- Less is better: for example, fewer assigned cases are better when determining agent ranking.
Weight
Each matching criterion has an assigned weight. By default, the matching criteria in the Recommendation for Case Assignment matching rule have an assigned weight of 10. You can assign a higher weight to the criteria that are more important.
Threshold
A threshold sets a minimum requirement for a criterion. For example, set the threshold of the Matching Skills criterion to 3 if you want to see only those agents who have at least three of the required skills for a task. For availability, set the threshold to the desired number of hours to display only those agents who have that minimum number of work hours available. You can set the threshold in the Select Criteria related list on the Matching Rule form. If necessary, personalize the list and add the Threshold column.
Active/Inactive
There can be several matching criteria associated with the matching rule that determines the assignment workbench configuration. Each individual criterion can be set to active or inactive. Changing this setting has an immediate impact on the agent ranking. You can make this change in the Select Criteria related list on the Matching Rule form. If necessary, personalize the list and add the Active column.
Calculating the agent ranking
- Calculate a number for each criterion.
- Multiply that number by the criterion weight.
- Divide the result by the total of all criterion weights.
- Repeat for each criterion and add the results.
- Matching Skills with Mandatory Skills Support: 5/6
- Availability Today: 7 hours
- Assigned Cases: 2
- Matching Skills:
2 / 3 = 0.666(with 3 being the maximum number of skills) - Availability Today:
7 / 8 = 0.875(with 8 being the maximum number of hours) - Assigned Cases:
2 / 26 = 0.0769(with 26 being the total number of tasks in the table) - Weight: each matching criteria has an equal weight of 10
((0.666 x 10) / Total of criterion weight (10+10+10)) + ((0.875 x 10) / Total of criterion weight (10+10+10)) + ((0.0769 x 10) / Total of criterion weight (10+10+10))(6.66 / 30) + (8.75 / 30) + (0.769 / 30)0.222 + 0.291 + 0.0256 = 0.53This calculation is performed for each agent in the assignment group. Agents are ranked based on the value of this calculation, with the highest number earning the highest ranking.