The risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems or from external events.
It is crucial to understand the benefits of operational risk management before implementation.
Not all risk is foreseeable, but a thorough risk analysis can still uncover potential risks for the best possible results.
Routine safety checks or reviews undertaken along the cycle of a project.
Operational risk management of this type is usually more urgent and performed during operational changes when time is limited. The potential consequences of not performing in a time-critical manner can be the creep of non-identified risks.
A set of practices and processes, supported by a risk-aware culture and enabling technologies, that improves decision making and performance through an integrated view of how well an organisation manages its unique set of risks.
There are multiple things that pose a risk to an organisation, both internal and external. The most risk possible needs to be identified, utilising all levers of the business. The risks to be identified need to be both one-off risks and recurring risks. Assess the risks once they have been identified from both a qualitative and quantitative perspective. Think about frequency of risk, severity and the actions that need to be taken in order to prevent and mitigate risk.
Apply controls to limit an organisation’s exposure to risk and increase the chance of risk mitigation.
Effective risk management means constantly monitoring risk and reporting on the risks when necessary in order to track the effectiveness of a risk management plan.
Organisations can use the output data from a risk assessment model as inputs into a model that measures risk exposure. Quantification systems should be validated in order to ensure that they are sufficiently robust, which provides assurance that the inputs, assumptions, processes and outputs are accurate.
Risk frameworks should be periodically reviewed by the board of directors. This helps them oversee senior management to ensure that each part of the policies and processes are implemented at all decision levels. The board of directors should also establish a risk tolerance stance that articulates the types, levels and nature of operational risks that are willing to be assumed.
Ensure that inherent risks and incentives are well understood by members of the staff by ensuring that all materials, activities and processes identify and assess operational risks. There should be an established culture that supports processes that promotes an understanding of operational risks that are inherent in strategies and daily activities of the organisation.
Management and governing bodies are accountable for setting the organisation’s objectives and outlining strategies to achieve objectives. Part of the objectives include managing risk to best accomplish the objectives using the three lines of defence model, which requires active support from senior management and the organisation’s governing body.
Operational risk management should focus on detecting and reporting risks of all types and it should be expanded to include a second line that works in partnership with the first line to create an effective resiliency in operations and processes.
There are necessary tools that are needed to evaluate a business process and its resiliency, challenge business management as needed and manage priorities.
Progress in analytics tools can assist with risk management—both structured and unstructured data are more available as time passes. Advanced analytics tools are applicable in nearly every area of risk management, including the detection of risk, identification of false positives, compliance, process failure and human risk.
Risk management requires a special set of skills and understanding of risk to spot risk activity, interpret the data and provide a thorough analysis. Managers, teams and individuals need to approach risk in new ways, including adaptation to processes and an understanding of how advanced analytics are becoming more and more relevant, especially with the implementation of machine learning and artificial intelligence systems.
Humans can be highly effective for operational risk management, but part of risk management is identifying and analysing how human error can affect operational risk management and pose its own unique risks.
After initially identifying risks, most risks should ideally be avoided. Risk avoidance works to minimise vulnerabilities and address risks that are identified as threats. Part of avoidance is providing the proper training and setting up the right policies and procedures.
Risk should ideally be avoided, but that isn’t always possible. Risk reduction is the understanding of risk and liabilities and the strategies implemented to reduce the risk and liabilities. Usually, risk is quantified, analysed and assigned certain levels of risk in order to create reduction priorities and operations for risk reduction.
Shared risk isn’t the transferral of risk. Risk sharing is meant to reduce the impact of uncertain events or certain risks. Tasks or responsibilities can be divided between departments or individuals within an organisation, which distributes the risk between several parties and assigns individual responsibilities in wider risk management practices.
Transferring risk is when one doesn’t take responsibility for risk—risk retaining is the opposite. An organisation retains risk by self-funding the risk and any subsequent consequences of the risk. Risk retaining is usually chosen after a financial analysis indicates that it is less expensive to retain risk than to transfer risk to a third party.
Manage risk and resilience in real time with ServiceNow.