A project plan may look great on paper, but that can all change once reality sets in. Unexpected problems arise, priorities shift, and customer needs evolve faster than the team can react. Traditional project management often treats these disruptions as failures, forcing teams to either stick to an outdated plan or scramble for last-minute fixes. The result? Missed deadlines, frustrated stakeholders, and a final product that no longer aligns with business goals. To counter this, organizations need a way to navigate uncertainty without sacrificing quality or productivity.
Successful teams do more than cope with change; they use it to their advantage. Instead of clinging to rigid workflows, they operate in short, focused cycles, continuously refining their approach based on real-world feedback. They emphasize collaboration, transparency, and efficiency, ensuring that every effort drives meaningful progress. This mindset isn’t accidental, it is built into a structured framework that helps teams thrive in unpredictable environments. This framework is called Scrum.
Scrum originated in the mid-1990s as a response to the inefficiencies of some project management methodologies. The term itself was inspired by rugby, where a ‘scrum’ refers to a structured formation of players working together. This analogy captures the essence of Scrum—a collaborative, iterative approach that allows teams to continuously improve in the face of project complexity.
The foundational concepts of Scrum were formally introduced by Ken Schwaber and Jeff Sutherland in 1995 at the Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages & Applications (OOPSLA) conference. They were inspired by an earlier Harvard Business Review article that highlighted how high-performing teams, particularly in product development, worked like rugby teams—moving forward as a unit rather than following a sequential, relay-style process.
Schwaber and Sutherland later formalized their ideas in The Scrum Guide. Since then, Scrum has evolved into one of the most widely used Agile frameworks. This approach is used across essentially every industry, but is particularly effective in application development, information technology (IT), marketing, and product management.
Without guiding principles, Scrum would be nothing more than a set of rules. This is why Scrum is built on a foundation of core values that shape how teams interact, make decisions, and approach their work. These values create a culture of collaboration and accountability, ensuring that every team member operates with a shared mindset:
Commitment
Scrum requires team members to be dedicated to achieving sprint goals and delivering high-quality work. This commitment fosters accountability and ownership.
Courage
Teams must have the courage to challenge assumptions, embrace change, and address obstacles head-on. They must also feel safe voicing concerns and suggesting improvements.
- Focus
Scrum emphasizes working on a limited set of high-priority tasks to maximize efficiency and ensure that each sprint is moving the project forward.
- Openness
Transparency is crucial in Scrum. Team members must openly share progress, challenges, and insights, ensuring continuous improvement.
- Respect
Collaboration thrives on mutual respect. Scrum teams acknowledge each member’s expertise and contributions, fostering a supportive work environment.
Unlike traditional project management methodologies that rely on rigid plans and predictive control, Scrum is an approach to Agile project management that is built on three core principles that exist to create a dynamic environment where teams can make informed decisions based on real-time insights. These principles are:
Transparency ensures that everyone involved has a clear understanding of the work in progress. Key elements of transparency include:
A well-maintained product backlog that outlines priorities.
Open and honest communication during daily Scrums (also called ‘daily stand-ups’) and sprint reviews.
A ‘definition of done’ (DoD) that ensures completed work meets the required standards.
Frequent inspections allow teams to evaluate progress and identify potential roadblocks. Scrum incorporates regular inspection through:
Sprint reviews, where teams highlight completed work and receive feedback.
Sprint retrospectives, that provide a dedicated time when teams can analyze what went well and what needs improvement.
Daily Scrum meetings, which provide an opportunity to track progress and adjust plans.
Scrum encourages teams to adjust their approach based on feedback and new insights. Adaptation occurs when:
Priorities shift due to changing business needs or customer feedback.
The team refines processes in retrospectives to improve future performance.
Adjustments are made during sprints to ensure alignment with business objectives.
Unlike traditional hierarchical structures, Scrum emphasizes self-organization and collective responsibility. As such, each role within the Scrum methodology plays a part in delivering value to stakeholders. The following are the primary functions within Scrum, and the responsibilities associated with each:
The product owner represents business interests and ensures that the most valuable work is prioritized. Their responsibilities include:
Managing and prioritizing the product backlog.
Communicating with stakeholders to align work with business goals.
Ensuring that each sprint delivers maximum value to users.
The Scrum master is a servant-leader responsible for facilitating the Scrum process and removing obstacles. Their responsibilities include:
Coaching the team on Scrum principles and best practices.
Removing impediments that hinder progress.
Facilitating Scrum events and ensuring productive discussions.
The development team consists of professionals (developers, testers, designers, etc.) responsible for delivering usable increments of work. They are primarily responsible for:
Self-organizing and deciding how to complete sprint tasks.
Collaborating closely with the product owner and stakeholders.
Continuously refining and improving their Agile workflow.
The product owner maintains and prioritizes a list of tasks and features in the product backlog. This serves as the central repository for all work that needs to be done, ensuring that the team has a comprehensive and organized list of tasks to focus on. The backlog evolves as the project progresses, with new items being added, refined, or removed based on changing priorities. Without proper backlog management, teams may not have clear direction in terms of what to do next.
Sprint planning marks the beginning of each sprint and sets the stage for the team’s work during the iteration. The team selects backlog items to complete in the upcoming sprint and defines what the goals of that sprint should be. Sprint planning involves the entire Scrum Team, who collectively decide what can and should be accomplished within the given time limit.
Sprint
A sprint is a timeboxed period (typically two to four weeks) during which the team works on selected tasks. This is the core working unit in Scrum, providing a structured timeframe to focus on delivering incremental value. Each sprint follows a predictable cycle, so teams can plan effectively while maintaining the flexibility to adapt where needed. A well-executed sprint results in a shippable product increment.
The daily Scrum is a brief meeting held every workday where team members discuss progress, challenges, and plans for that day. This meeting is timeboxed to 15 minutes and follows a structured format where team members typically answer three key questions:
- What did I do yesterday?
- What will I do today?
- Are there any obstacles in my way?
Regular stand-ups are a consistent daily check-in, where teams can account for problems and work together to prevent minor issues from escalating into major roadblocks.
The sprint review is a presentation of completed work with the purpose of generating constructive feedback. This event provides an opportunity for the Scrum team to showcase their product and gather valuable input from various stakeholders. During the sprint review, the team walks through the completed work, highlighting any key features, changes, or improvements. Stakeholders, including customers and business leaders, can ask questions, provide insights, and suggest refinements based on their needs. The feedback collected during this event is then put to use shaping the next iteration.
Sprint retrospective
Unlike the sprint review, which focuses on the product, the sprint retrospective is dedicated to evaluating the team’s processes, collaboration, and overall efficiency. The goal is to identify what worked well, what could be improved, and what concrete steps can be taken to enhance future sprints.
The backlog is a dynamic, prioritized list of features, tasks, and requirements maintained by the product owner. This backlog is the foundation of all Scrum work, serving as the single source of truth for the team's priorities. Items in the backlog, known as product backlog items (PBIs), can range from new features and bug fixes to technical improvements and research tasks. The Product owner is responsible for continuously refining the backlog, ensuring that items are clearly defined and ordered based on value.
A subset of the product backlog selected for completion within a sprint, the sprint backlog represents the work that the team has committed to delivering. It includes specific tasks required to achieve the sprint goal. Unlike the broader product backlog, which may contain long-term items, the sprint backlog is highly focused and time constrained. Throughout the sprint, the backlog may evolve as new information emerges, but the overarching goal will remain unchanged.
Lastly, an increment is a usable product outcome from a sprint. An increment is a collection of completed tasks, but it is also something more—a functional and potentially shippable product state that meets the DoD. Each increment builds upon earlier iterations, progressively enhancing the products and always moving the work forward.
Each of these methodologies has a unique history and development, shaped by unique needs and industries.
Scrum originated in the 1990s, inspired by rugby’s team-based coordination. It was introduced by Ken Schwaber and Jeff Sutherland.
Agile was introduced in 2001 with the Agile Manifesto. It is a philosophy rather than a framework. It encompasses multiple methodologies, including Scrum, Kanban, and Extreme Programming (XP)
Kanban was developed in the Toyota Production System in the 1940s and was initially a lean manufacturing tool before being adapted for software development.
While all three emphasize efficiency and adaptability, their guiding principles differ.
Scrum focuses on delivering work in short, timeboxed iterations, with strict role definitions and continuous inspection and adaptation.
Agile advocates flexibility, collaboration, and iterative delivery but does not prescribe a specific structure. Agile frameworks (like Scrum) implement its principles in different ways.
Kanban emphasizes continuous delivery and workflow optimization, reducing bottlenecks by limiting work in progress (WIP) rather than working in fixed-length cycles.
Each approach has distinct working methods that define how tasks are managed and completed.
Scrum uses timeboxed sprints, predefined roles, and structured events.
Agile is a flexible approach with no strict rules—teams can adapt methods based on project needs.
Kanban uses a visual board to track work in progress, manages flow through WIP limits, and allows tasks to move fluidly without fixed iterations.
Scrum is the only framework of the three that defines specific roles, while Agile and Kanban leave them more fluid.
- Scrum requires three key roles: product owner, Scrum master, and development team to manage priorities, processes, and execution.
- Agile does not mandate specific roles but encourages collaboration and self-organizing teams that fit the project’s needs.
- Kanban lacks formal roles; teams organize themselves but may designate a Service Delivery Manager or Flow Manager to oversee progress.
Each methodology measures progress differently, using distinct performance indicators.
- Scrum uses velocity (work completed per sprint), burndown charts (remaining work over time), and sprint goals to track progress.
- Agile focuses on customer satisfaction, adaptability, and cycle time rather than fixed metrics, adapting measures as needed.
- Kanban relies on lead time (time from request to completion), cycle time (time spent on a task), and WIP limits to optimize workflow.
As previously addressed, Scrum prioritizes flexibility and iterative progress. In doing so, it creates a structured approach that helps keep teams focused on their objectives while also allowing them to adjust quickly and easily to match changing needs. This balance optimizes project management, delivering the following advantages:
Scrum offers a number of benefits, but it’s not always smooth sailing. Implementing Scrum effectively requires a shift in mindset, backed by strong team collaboration and commitment. Teams that are new to Scrum may struggle with adapting to the fast pace and expectations of self-organization. Before fully committing to a Scrum-based approach, consider the following potential obstacles:
Scrum encourages focused, collaborative work. But in reality, many team members find themselves assigned to multiple projects at once. This divided attention can reduce efficiency and make it difficult to fully engage in the Scrum process. When individuals juggle multiple commitments, they may struggle to attend Daily Scrums, fully contribute to sprints, or maintain clear priorities. To mitigate this challenge, organizations should strive to minimize context-switching and assign team members to a single Scrum team whenever possible. If multitasking is unavoidable, clear workload management and prioritization strategies are essential to maintain productivity without the risk of overburdening individual members.
The Scrum sprint structure means work must be completed within a fixed duration. Teams may have trouble accurately estimating how much can be accomplished within a Sprint, leading to unfinished tasks or rushed work at the end of the cycle. When this is an issue, help teams refine their estimation techniques using historical data and velocity tracking to improve sprint planning.
Scrum’s iterative nature is one of its biggest advantages. That said, iterativeness also assumes that any issues will be identified and resolved quickly. If a team lacks that ability, obstacles can pile up and delay or derail progress. A strong Scrum master takes the center role in facilitating problem resolution, but team members must also be active in voicing concerns and collaborating to find solutions. Encouraging a culture of continuous learning and knowledge sharing can help teams become more agile in their problem-solving efforts.
Scrum is designed to foster collective ownership of work, but performance evaluations in many organizations are still based on individual achievements. This disconnect can create tension within teams, as members may focus on personal success rather than team outcomes. Organizations using Scrum should consider shifting their evaluation methods to emphasize team contributions, shared accountability, and collaborative success.
The challenges listed above may seem daunting, but they do not have to stand in the way of successful Scrum implementation. The following best practices can help even the most reluctant teams find success:
Scrum thrives on teamwork, but true collaboration goes beyond simply working alongside others. Encouraging peer-to-peer collaboration means fostering an environment where team members actively and easily share knowledge, support each other, and collectively solve problems. This can be achieved through pair programming and cross-functional training, and is further supported by open discussions during daily Scrums and sprint retrospectives.
Scrum relies on fixed-length sprints to maintain a steady, predictable pace of work. Of course, these timeboxes can feel overly rigid, and it can be tempting to extend sprint deadlines to allow for more breathing room. But while flexibility is a major advantage of Scrum, constantly adjusting sprint durations can lead to inconsistencies and hinder progress tracking. Teams should adhere to the recommended time frame—typically two weeks—to strike a balance between responsiveness and sustainable development. Shorter sprints may not allow enough time to complete meaningful work, while longer sprints can reduce urgency and delay feedback.
A well-structured Scrum board provides visibility into the team’s workflow, helping members track progress, identify roadblocks, and work towards established objectives. Whether physical or digital, a Scrum board should clearly display the product backlog, sprint backlog, and current work status. Virtual Scrum boards offer added flexibility by enabling remote collaboration and automated tracking.
Scrum events include several opportunities to bring everyone together to discuss the project, but meetings should never become an end in themselves. Each meeting should serve a clear purpose that directly contributes to the sprint’s success. Teams should focus on keeping discussions concise, actionable, and aligned with their objectives. If a meeting does not drive meaningful progress toward the Sprint Goal, it may need restructuring.
ServiceNow provides a comprehensive suite of applications and solutions through the ServiceNow AI Platform, empowering your team to implement Scrum effectively for planning, tracking, and automating workflows. ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management (SPM) gives you everything you need to align your Agile initiatives with business goals. By leveraging real-time data, automation, and advanced AI-powered insights, SPM helps you prioritize work, manage dependencies, and drive continuous value delivery.
ServiceNow Scrum Programs for Agile Development further streamlines collaboration for multiple teams working toward shared outcomes. The Scrum Program Planning Board provides a centralized interface where your organization can assign work, track progress, and manage dependencies across departments, ensuring seamless coordination even in complex Agile environments. Teams can operate with synchronized or varied Sprint cadences while maintaining full visibility into backlog prioritization and workload distribution.
See how Strategic Portfolio Management in ServiceNow can improve your approach to goals-setting; schedule a demo today!