Domain separation and Audit Management

Domain separation is supported for Audit Management. Domain separation enables you to separate data, processes, and administrative tasks into logical groupings called domains. You can control several aspects of this separation, including which users can see and access data.

Support level: Basic

• Business logic: Ensure that data goes into the proper domain for the application’s service provider use cases.
• The application supports domain separation at run time. The domain separation includes separation from the user interface, cache keys, reporting, rollups, and aggregations.
• The owner of the instance must set up the application to function across multiple tenants.

Sample use case: When a service provider (SP) uses chat to respond to a tenant-customer’s message, the customer must be able to see the SP's response.

For more information on support levels, see Application support for domain separation.

Benefits of having domain-separated tables in Audit Management

Domain separation is best for those customers who:

• Need to enforce absolute data segregation between business entities (data separation).
• Customize business process definitions and user interfaces for each domain (delegated administration).
• Maintain some global processes and global reporting in a single instance.

These users can choose to expand or collapse the domain scope to show or hide data from other domains.

Note:

Users always have access to data from domains that have been explicitly granted to them by domain visibility.

How domain separation works in Audit Management

While GRC supports separation of data, separation of logic and process is not fully supported.

• Many types of records in GRC are automatically generated through user processes. Entities, controls, risks, indicators, and control tests are all fields that can be generated automatically. For records that are automatically generated (and for any GRC record that is manually generated), the domain of the record is the same as the domain of the user responsible for creating or generating the records.
• Automatic generation should be kept in mind when working in a domain-separated GRC implementation. Users should be sure that they are creating / generating records at the right domain level so that they are visible to the right set of users.

  For example, suppose you have domains that look like:

  

• If you have a risk or control that you want to be assessed by users in domains A and B, the risk or control should be generated or manually created at the global level. If the risk or control is created in Domain B, you will not be able to recreate the risk or control in Domain A due to indexing.
• If you have a risk or control that you want to be assessed by users in TOP and Domain A, you can create the risk or control in Domain A.

Unless the risks and controls are in the Global domain, users should not assign risks or controls in a higher domain to users in a lower domain. In the example above, if you have a control in the TOP domain, you should not assign it for attestation to users in Domains A or B since those users would not have access to the control; thus the attestation or assessment questionnaire would not be generated.

Similarly, users should not assign control objectives and risk statements in a higher domain to attestations and assessments in a lower domain. Otherwise the attestation or assessment questionnaire would not be generated.

Use cases

GRC data for IT can be separated from the GRC data of other departments. Each business area using the GRC application can have separate data that cannot be shared with other departments. Therefore each department can have its own entities, policies, controls, risks, and so on.

When looking at a control from the IT domain, the user can choose to expand the domain scope to show values from the Finance domain or collapse the domain scope to show only controls that match the IT domain.

By default, domain separation adds a domain field to the Task [task]and Configuration Items [cmdb_ci] tables and their extensions.

You can extend domain separation to any new tables you create by adding a sys_domain field to the table's dictionary definition. By default, the system only domain-separates platform and baseline application tables where appropriate.

Warning:

ServiceNow does not recommend domain separating platform tables (any table with the sys_ prefix such as the Dictionary Entry [sys_dictionary]and Dictionary Entry Override [sys_dictionary_override] tables) because it can produce unexpected results.

In this use case, client scripts, business rules, workflows, processes, and so on can be domain-separated.

While the behavior offered with domain separation provides multi-tenancy support, multi-tenancy is still contained within a single instance. This means that some global properties, some global data, and some global processes are shared across all domains. For example, the system’s “Remember me” option on the login page is global and cannot be specified per domain.

If you need complete and total separation of all system properties and do not require global reporting or global processes, separate instances are the best option.

Allocation of domain values to Audit Management objects

The following changes are made to the domain assignment process to manage data segregation by the Managed Service Providers related to Audit Management tables:

Table 1. GRC Audit Management

Audit Management objects	Domain source
Activity	User creating activity or Engagement
Audit Report Template	User
Audit task	Engagement
Control test	Engagement
Control to Engagement	Engagement
Entity to Engagement	Engagement
Interview	Engagement
Issue to Engagement	Engagement
Risk to Engagement	Engagement
Test plan	User
Test plan to Engagement	Engagement
Test template	User creating template
Walkthrough	Engagement

Table 2. GRC Advanced Audit

Advanced Audit	Domain source
Audit task to Milestone	Audit task or Control test
Auditable unit	User
Auditable unit to Authority document	Auditable unit
Auditable unit to Business application	Auditable unit
Auditable unit to Business process	Auditable unit
Auditable unit to Business unit	Auditable unit
Auditable unit to Department	Auditable unit
Auditable unit to Location	Auditable unit
Auditable unit to Policy	Auditable unit
Auditable unit to Product	Auditable unit
Auditable unit to Vendor	Auditable unit
Engagement	User
Engagement project	Engagement
Milestone	Engagement
Observation	Engagement
Plan	User

Related topics

• Domain separation for service providers